Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States v. Marlo Brown, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Marlo Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying Brown's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Marlo Brown, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Marlo Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying Brown's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7111

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Marlo Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying Brown's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Marlo Brown, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Marlo Brown appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling denying Brown's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7111

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MARLO BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2013

    Decided:

    October 25, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marlo Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, Charles Joseph


    Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Barbara
    Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marlo Brown appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on Browns 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1 (D. Md. June 25, 2013).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.

    Brown,

    No.

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like