Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, JR., 74 F.3d 1234, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1996 in which Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard W. Crossen Jr. in district court. The district court denied relief. Turner appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 74 F.3d 1234 Docket: 95-7239

    Original Title

    Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, Jr., 74 F.3d 1234, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1996 in which Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard W. Crossen Jr. in district court. The district court denied relief. Turner appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views1 page

    Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, JR., 74 F.3d 1234, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1996 in which Robert Douglas Turner filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard W. Crossen Jr. in district court. The district court denied relief. Turner appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    74 F.

    3d 1234
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Robert Douglas TURNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    Richard W. CROSSEN, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 95-7239.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
    Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    Robert Douglas Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
    ED.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Crossen, No. CA-95-365 (E.D.Va.
    Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like