Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mulazim v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Ahoto Taysir Mulazim on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court also decided oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6801

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Ahoto Taysir Mulazim on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court also decided oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Mulazim v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Ahoto Taysir Mulazim on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The court also decided oral argument was not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6801

    AHOTO TAYSIR MULAZIM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; GENE M. JOHNSON;
    DAVID A. BRAXTON; CALVIN D. JAMISON; STEVE
    BURCIN;
    CHARLES
    C.
    COSBY;
    CHERYL
    J.
    FRYDRYSHOWSKI; J. THADIEU HARRIS, III; R. A.
    YOUNG; P. SAUL; A. FLEENOR,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-02-1135-7)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2003

    Decided:

    September 24, 2003

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ahoto

    Taysir

    Mulazim

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Mulazim

    v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1135-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like