Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brooks v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a habeas corpus petition filed by Willie Jacob Brooks under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6394

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a habeas corpus petition filed by Willie Jacob Brooks under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Brooks v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a habeas corpus petition filed by Willie Jacob Brooks under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6394

    WILLIE JACOB BROOKS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director of the South Carolina
    Department of Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-95-1947-2-22AJ)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 2, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Willie Jacob Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brooks v.
    Moore, No. CA-95-1947-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 26, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like