Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Diaz v. Baan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Pedro Diaz appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical and administrative officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on its review of the record and finding no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-01-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7645

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Pedro Diaz appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical and administrative officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on its review of the record and finding no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Diaz v. Baan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Pedro Diaz appealed a district court order that denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical and administrative officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision based on its review of the record and finding no reversible error. 3) The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7645

    PEDRO DIAZ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR JOHN DOE BAAN; GEORGE WILKES; BARBARA
    KNIGHT; HOPE HARRISON,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
    UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD,

    OF

    CORRECTIONS
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-263-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    December 19, 2002

    Decided:

    January 7, 2003

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Pedro Diaz, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE


    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Pedro Diaz appeals the district courts order accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and

    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    of the district court.

    See Diaz v. Baan, No. CA-01-263-5-BR

    (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like