Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Smith v. SSA, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Ted Smith appealed the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income by the Social Security Administration to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The district court upheld the Commissioner's denial. Smith then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to uphold the Commissioner's denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-2062

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ted Smith appealed the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income by the Social Security Administration to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The district court upheld the Commissioner's denial. Smith then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to uphold the Commissioner's denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Smith v. SSA, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ted Smith appealed the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income by the Social Security Administration to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The district court upheld the Commissioner's denial. Smith then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to uphold the Commissioner's denial. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-2062

    TED SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:05-cv-00577-NCT)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2008

    Decided:

    August 25, 2008

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ted Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Kavonne L. Mayeski, SOCIAL SECURITY


    ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts; John W. Stone, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ted Smith appeals the district courts order accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the
    Commissioners

    denial

    of

    disability

    insurance

    benefits

    and

    supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find


    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.

    Smith v. Social Security Admin., No. 1:05-

    cv-00577-NCT (M.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2007).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like