Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Miles v. Herman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Mary E. Miles appealed a district court's dismissal of her civil case against the Secretary of Labor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed without oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1674

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mary E. Miles appealed a district court's dismissal of her civil case against the Secretary of Labor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed without oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Miles v. Herman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mary E. Miles appealed a district court's dismissal of her civil case against the Secretary of Labor. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed without oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1674

    MARY E. MILES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ALEXIS M. HERMAN, Secretary, United States
    Department of Labor,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (CA-97-112-4)

    Submitted:

    August 5, 1999

    Decided:

    August 10, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mary E. Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anson Rhine, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mary E. Miles appeals the district courts order dismissing
    her civil case.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we af-

    firm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Miles v. Herman,

    No. CA-97-112-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like