Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Willis v. Atlantic Indem Co, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Daniel Johnson Willis filed a complaint against multiple defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law claims. The district court denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims. Willis appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the district court properly denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Willis v. Atlantic Indem Co, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Daniel Johnson Willis filed a complaint against multiple defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law claims. The district court denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims. Willis appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the district court properly denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-05-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1181

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Daniel Johnson Willis filed a complaint against multiple defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law claims. The district court denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims. Willis appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the district court properly denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Willis v. Atlantic Indem Co, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Daniel Johnson Willis filed a complaint against multiple defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law claims. The district court denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims. Willis appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the district court properly denied relief on the 1983 claims and dismissed the state law claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1181

    DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ATLANTIC INDEMNITY COMPANY; MARVIN QUINN;
    SANDRA FISHER; JOSEPH FISHER; LYNDA SINK; SHAY
    CAMPBELL; JAMIE COLE; CAROLE BERNARDO; STEVE
    FRAZELLE; DIANE GREENE; HERRINGS INSURANCE
    COMPANY; MARY HERRINGS; BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
    COMPANY; JAMES HERRINGS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-01-147-4-H)

    Submitted:

    April 25, 2002

    Decided:

    May 6, 2002

    Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Earl Dunn, Sr.,
    DUNN, DUNN & STOLLER, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district courts order
    denying

    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.A.

    1983

    (West

    complaint and dismissing his state law claims.

    Supp.

    2001)

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    Willis

    v.

    Atlantic

    (E.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2002).

    Indemnity

    Co.,

    No.

    CA-01-147-4-H

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like