Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nicholas M. Carter, Ruth A. Carter v. Jack Pinkston, Garnishee, 322 F.2d 476, 4th Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order overruling a motion to quash attachments issued in a case. The appellant sought to raise issues that were already settled in a previous case. Specifically, the issues had been decided against the appellant in Pinkston v. Carter, D.C.Mun.App., 150 A.2d 629, making them res judicata. The district court's order was therefore affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1963-09-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 322 F.2d 476 Docket: 9075

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order overruling a motion to quash attachments issued in a case. The appellant sought to raise issues that were already settled in a previous case. Specifically, the issues had been decided against the appellant in Pinkston v. Carter, D.C.Mun.App., 150 A.2d 629, making them res judicata. The district court's order was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views1 page

    Nicholas M. Carter, Ruth A. Carter v. Jack Pinkston, Garnishee, 322 F.2d 476, 4th Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order overruling a motion to quash attachments issued in a case. The appellant sought to raise issues that were already settled in a previous case. Specifically, the issues had been decided against the appellant in Pinkston v. Carter, D.C.Mun.App., 150 A.2d 629, making them res judicata. The district court's order was therefore affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    322 F.

    2d 476

    Nicholas M. CARTER, Ruth A. Carter, Appellees,


    v.
    Jack PINKSTON, Garnishee, Appellant.
    No. 9075.

    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.


    Argued September 25, 1963.
    Decided September 30, 1963.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland
    at Baltimore; Harrison L. Winter, District Judge.
    Jack Pinkston, pro se.
    James P. Donovan and Roy C. Frank, Washington, D. C., on brief for
    appellees.
    Before HAYNSWORTH, BOREMAN, and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    This is an appeal from an order of the district court overruling the appellant's
    motion to quash certain attachments issued by the district court.

    The appellant here seeks to raise again issues which are clearly res judicata.
    Appellant had his day in court. See Pinkston v. Carter, D.C.Mun.App., 150
    A.2d 629. The order of the district court in this case is

    Affirmed.

    You might also like