Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Cason v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Cason's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Cason's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Cason v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Cason's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Cason's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6864

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Cason's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Cason's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Cason v. Smith, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Gregory Cason's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied Cason's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6864

    GREGORY A. CASON, a/k/a George Cason,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
    (CA-97-1263-WMN)

    Submitted:

    October 27, 1998

    Decided:

    November 10, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Gregory A. Cason, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General,
    Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cason v. Smith, No. CA-97-1263-WMN (D. Md. June 4,
    1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like