Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Michael Peninger, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Michael Peninger, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 13-7592
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cr-00034-PMD-1, 2:13-cv-01130-PMD)
Submitted:
Thomas Aull Withers, Sr., GILLEN, WITHERS & LAKE, LLC, Savannah,
Georgia, for Appellant. Michael Rhett DeHart, Dean Hodge Secor,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Derrick Peninger seeks to appeal the district
courts
motion.
judge
order
denying
on
his
28
U.S.C.
2255
(2012)
certificate
2253(c)(1)(B) (2012).
issue
relief
absent
of
28
U.S.C.
substantial
constitutional right.
appealability.
showing
of
the
denial
of
When the
standard
by
demonstrating
that
reasonable
jurists
would
484
Cockrell,
(2000);
(2003).
see
Miller-El
v.
537
U.S.
322,
336-38
Slack,
Accordingly,
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED