Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, H. Richard Austin, appealed a district court ruling dismissing his Rule 60(d)(3) complaint against the defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, H. Richard Austin, appealed a district court ruling dismissing his Rule 60(d)(3) complaint against the defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1578

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, H. Richard Austin, appealed a district court ruling dismissing his Rule 60(d)(3) complaint against the defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    H. Austin v. Douglas Peterson & Associates, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from the Fourth Circuit. The plaintiff, H. Richard Austin, appealed a district court ruling dismissing his Rule 60(d)(3) complaint against the defendants. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1578

    H. RICHARD AUSTIN, St. Louis, Missouri,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DOUGLAS G. PETERSON & ASSOCIATES, Greenfield, Massachusetts;
    STEPHEN W. HOUGHTON, Greenfield, Massachusetts; JIMMY PAU,
    Cary, North Carolina,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:13-cv-00877-BO)

    Submitted:

    October 16, 2014

    Decided:

    October 20, 2014

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    H. Richard Austin, Appellant Pro Se.


    George L. Goodridge,
    CURTISS, CAREY, GATES, GRAVES & GOODRIDGE, LLP, Greenfield,
    Massachusetts; Paul Marshall Yoder, WHARTON ALDHIZER & WEAVER,
    PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    H. Richard Austin appeals from the district courts
    order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
    60(d)(3) against Defendants.

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.


    Peterson
    2014).
    legal
    before

    &

    Assocs.,

    No.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    Austin v. Douglas G.

    5:13-cv-00877-BO

    (E.D.N.C.

    May

    12,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like