Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • LaRoque v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from George Paul LaRoque of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), finding the appeal frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed the appeal was frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6588

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from George Paul LaRoque of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), finding the appeal frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed the appeal was frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    LaRoque v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from George Paul LaRoque of a district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), finding the appeal frivolous. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed the appeal was frivolous, dismissing it for the same reasons provided by the district court in its previous order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6588

    GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    THEODIS BECK;
    GALETSCHRY,

    JAMES

    E.

    LANGSTON;

    THEODORE

    WALKER;

    HEIDI

    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    Senior District Judge. (5:09-ct-03025-H)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2009

    Decided:

    June 25, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George Paul LaRoque appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    that

    this

    appeal

    is

    We have reviewed the record and find

    frivolous.

    Accordingly,

    we

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03025-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009).

    dismiss

    the

    LaRoque v.
    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    DISMISSED

    You might also like