Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    United States v. Anthony Snipe, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a denial of a motion by Anthony Lamar Snipe under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court affirmed the district court's denial of Snipe's motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Anthony Snipe, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a denial of a motion by Anthony Lamar Snipe under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court affirmed the district court's denial of Snipe's motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6687

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a denial of a motion by Anthony Lamar Snipe under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court affirmed the district court's denial of Snipe's motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Anthony Snipe, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a denial of a motion by Anthony Lamar Snipe under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The court affirmed the district court's denial of Snipe's motion. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Therefore, the court affirmed the district court's order denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6687

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

    Submitted:

    August 18, 2011

    Decided:

    August 23, 2011

    Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we affirm the district courts order.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like