Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Blakney, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James Curtis Blakney of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Blakney a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 11, 2001 order denying Blakney's § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Blakney, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James Curtis Blakney of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Blakney a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 11, 2001 order denying Blakney's § 2255 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7092

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James Curtis Blakney of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Blakney a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 11, 2001 order denying Blakney's § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Blakney, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James Curtis Blakney of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It therefore denied Blakney a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its June 11, 2001 order denying Blakney's § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7092

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES CURTIS BLAKNEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-94-54, CA-97-235-3-02)

    Submitted:

    October 4, 2001

    Decided:

    October 12, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Curtis Blakney, Appellant Pro Se.
    Harry Thomas Church,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Curtis Blakney seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny Blakneys

    Motion for Appeal of the Denial of Movants 2255 Motion, deny a


    certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Blakney v. United States, Nos. CR-

    94-54; CA-97-235-3-02 (W.D.N.C. filed June 8, 2001; entered June


    11, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like