Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John Beaman v. Deputy Director, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    John Beaman appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied Beaman's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7136

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Beaman appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied Beaman's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    John Beaman v. Deputy Director, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Beaman appealed the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit denied Beaman's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7136

    JOHN H. BEAMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Community Corrections; HAROLD W. CLARKE,
    Director; LOU CEI, Special Programs Manager; LAYTON LESTER,
    Warden; ELIZABETH E. CARR, Counselor; BOB MCDONNELL,
    Governor of Virginia; WILLIAM M. MUSE, Chairman, VA Parole
    Board; KAREN D. BROWN, Vice-Chair VA Parole Board; RITA J.
    ANGELONE, VA Parole Board Member; MINOR F. STONE, VA Parole
    Board Member,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:12-cv-00163-JLK-RSB)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2012

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: November 27, 2012

    and

    SHEDD

    and

    FLOYD,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John H. Beaman, Appellant Pro se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John
    dismissing
    (2006).

    H.

    his

    Beaman

    civil

    appeals

    complaint

    the
    under

    district
    28

    courts

    U.S.C.

    order

    1915A(b)

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Beaman v. Deputy Dir., No. 7:12-cv-00163-

    JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. May 29, 2012).


    appointment of counsel.

    We deny Beamans motion for

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like