Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Edward McReady v. Martin O'Malley, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Edward McReady appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants in McReady's consolidated civil actions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court also granted McReady's motion to file an overlength informal brief and denied as moot several other pending motions related to briefing length.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Edward McReady v. Martin O'Malley, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Edward McReady appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants in McReady's consolidated civil actions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court also granted McReady's motion to file an overlength informal brief and denied as moot several other pending motions related to briefing length.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1451

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Edward McReady appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants in McReady's consolidated civil actions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court also granted McReady's motion to file an overlength informal brief and denied as moot several other pending motions related to briefing length.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Edward McReady v. Martin O'Malley, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Edward McReady appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants in McReady's consolidated civil actions. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court also granted McReady's motion to file an overlength informal brief and denied as moot several other pending motions related to briefing length.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1451

    EDWARD C. MCREADY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MARTIN O'MALLEY, Honorable, in his official capacity as
    Governor of the State of Maryland; UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF
    MARYLAND;
    WILLIAM
    E.
    KIRWAN;
    UNIVERSITY
    OF
    MARYLAND
    UNIVERSITY COLLEGE; SUSAN ALDRIDGE; LAWRENCE E. LEAK; GREG
    VON LEHMAN; JOHN VOLPE; RHEA REED; RACHEL ZELKIND; SHAWNA
    ACKER-BALL; MEGAN FARRELL; THOMAS HOGAN; STATE OF MARYLAND;
    ELIZABETH MULHERRIN; ADELAIDE A. LAGNESE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-02347-RWT; 8:08-cv-02386-RWT)

    Submitted:

    February 6, 2012

    Decided:

    March 12, 2012

    Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Edward C. McReady, Appellant Pro Se.


    Thomas Faulk, Assistant
    Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward C. McReady appeals the district courts order
    granting

    Defendants

    motion

    for

    consolidated civil actions.

    summary

    judgment

    in

    his

    We have reviewed the record and

    conclude there is no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See McReady v.

    OMalley, Nos. 8:08-cv-02347-RWT; 8:08-cv-02386-RWT (D. Md. Mar.


    31, 2011).

    Further, because we grant McReadys motion for leave

    to file an amended informal brief in excess of the fifty-page


    limitation ordered by the Clerks Office, we deny as moot all
    other pending motions related to the length of McReadys amended
    informal brief, including Defendants motion to strike McReadys
    amended

    informal

    brief

    and

    McReadys

    motion

    to

    Defendants opposition to his enlarged informal brief.


    deny

    as

    moot

    McReadys

    expedited review.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    motions

    for

    summary

    strike
    We also

    disposition

    and

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like