Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Roy v. Singleton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction over Roy's case against Lorraine Singleton. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors, so it affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The court provided this summary in an unpublished opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7155

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction over Roy's case against Lorraine Singleton. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors, so it affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The court provided this summary in an unpublished opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Roy v. Singleton, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 1996. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Michael Lee Roy's civil action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found it did not have jurisdiction over Roy's case against Lorraine Singleton. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no errors, so it affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the case. The court provided this summary in an unpublished opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7155

    MICHAEL LEE ROY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LORRAINE SINGLETON,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CA-96-369)
    Submitted:

    November 19, 1996

    Decided:

    December 2, 1996

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Lee Roy, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
    civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roy
    v. Singleton, No. CA-96-369 (E.D. Va. July 17, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like