Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Wideman v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Bobby Wideman's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Wideman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The appeals court denied Wideman's request for appointment of a guardian and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wideman v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Bobby Wideman's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Wideman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The appeals court denied Wideman's request for appointment of a guardian and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-6965

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Bobby Wideman's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Wideman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The appeals court denied Wideman's request for appointment of a guardian and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Wideman v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Bobby Wideman's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Wideman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The appeals court denied Wideman's request for appointment of a guardian and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-6965

    BOBBY L. WIDEMAN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,
    Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-94-1022-6-22AK)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 23, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bobby L. Wideman, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of a
    guardian ad litem, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Wideman v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-1022-6-22AK (D.S.C. May 30,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like