Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2006. It states that Eddie Thomas Jackson appealed a district court order denying his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion. The court reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons cited. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7902

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2006. It states that Eddie Thomas Jackson appealed a district court order denying his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion. The court reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons cited. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Jackson, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2006. It states that Eddie Thomas Jackson appealed a district court order denying his motion to compel the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion. The court reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons cited. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were clear in the materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7902

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDDIE THOMAS JACKSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    C. Weston Houck, Senior District
    Judge. (4:00-cr-00607-CWH)

    Submitted: February 15, 2007

    Decided:

    February 26, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eddie Thomas Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Alfred William Walker
    Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eddie Thomas Jackson appeals a district court order
    denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Federal Rules
    of Criminal Procedure Rule 35(b) motion.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts order and affirm for the reasons
    cited by the district court.

    See United States v. Jackson, No.

    4:00-cr-00607-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2006).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like