Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rogers v. Carr, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    1. Nevell Rogers filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr, which was denied by the district court. 2. Rogers appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Rogers' complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6117

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. Nevell Rogers filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr, which was denied by the district court. 2. Rogers appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Rogers' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Rogers v. Carr, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1. Nevell Rogers filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr, which was denied by the district court. 2. Rogers appealed the district court's denial to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Rogers' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6117

    NEVELL ROGERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT S. CARR, United States Magistrate Judge,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3829-3-OBC)
    Submitted:

    May 28, 1996

    Decided:

    June 6, 1996

    Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nevell Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Carr,
    No. CA-95-3829-3-OBC (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like