Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Mattison v. Brown, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Mattison appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants Tony Brown and Robert Carilles in Mattison's lawsuit alleging improper interference with his mail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation, and affirmed based on the district court's reasoning that Defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Mattison v. Brown, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Calvin Mattison appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants Tony Brown and Robert Carilles in Mattison's lawsuit alleging improper interference with his mail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation, and affirmed based on the district court's reasoning that Defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7855

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvin Mattison appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants Tony Brown and Robert Carilles in Mattison's lawsuit alleging improper interference with his mail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation, and affirmed based on the district court's reasoning that Defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Mattison v. Brown, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Mattison appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants Tony Brown and Robert Carilles in Mattison's lawsuit alleging improper interference with his mail. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion adopting the magistrate's recommendation, and affirmed based on the district court's reasoning that Defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7855

    CALVIN R. MATTISON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TONY BROWN; ROBERT CARRILES,
    Defendant - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.
    Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-2610-9-6JC)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 18, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Calvin R. Mattison, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the
    Defendants' motion for summary judgment in Appellant's action
    alleging improper interference with his mail. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mattison
    v. Brown, No. CA-94-2610-9-6JC (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like