Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Collins v. Woodard, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Mickey Collins, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against several prison officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Collins' complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) for failure to state a claim. Collins appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6653

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Mickey Collins, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against several prison officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Collins' complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) for failure to state a claim. Collins appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Collins v. Woodard, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Mickey Collins, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against several prison officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Collins' complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) for failure to state a claim. Collins appealed the dismissal. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6653

    MICKEY V. COLLINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    G. L. WOODARD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WESTBROOK;
    NURSE BROUGHTON; P. A. HINDS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, District
    Judge. (CA-95-264-5-BR)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 2, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mickey V. Collins, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915(d)
    (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Woodard, No. CA-95-2645-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like