Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Parker, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Demond O'Neil Parker appealed the district court's order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court denied Parker's motions to vacate the district court's order, appoint counsel, and remand the case back to the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Parker, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Demond O'Neil Parker appealed the district court's order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court denied Parker's motions to vacate the district court's order, appoint counsel, and remand the case back to the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8463

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Demond O'Neil Parker appealed the district court's order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court denied Parker's motions to vacate the district court's order, appoint counsel, and remand the case back to the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Parker, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Demond O'Neil Parker appealed the district court's order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's order. The appellate court denied Parker's motions to vacate the district court's order, appoint counsel, and remand the case back to the lower court. As the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court, oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8463

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DEMOND ONEIL PARKER, a/k/a Neil,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
    Norman K. Moon, District
    Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2009

    Decided:

    June 4, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Demond ONeil Parker, Appellant Pro Se.


    Anthony Paul Giorno,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Demond

    ONeil

    Parker

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)

    (2006).

    We

    reversible error.

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we deny Parkers motions to:

    vacate the district courts order, appoint counsel, and remand


    the case, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.

    United States v. Parker, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-9 (W.D.

    Va. Oct. 20, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like