Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • George Hood v. Tracy Johns, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    George Hood filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Hood appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as unnecessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-10-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6664

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Hood filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Hood appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    George Hood v. Tracy Johns, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Hood filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Hood appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6664

    GEORGE ALBERT HOOD,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TRACY W. JOHNS; ANDRES HERNANDEZ; KAREN STEINOUR; FREDDIE
    GARRIDO; ANDREA TAYLOR; UNIT MANAGER WEAVER; MARGRET HALE;
    LIEUTENANT
    BELL;
    LIEUTENANT
    FERNANDEZ;
    OFFICER
    SMITH;
    OFFICER RUFFIN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:11-ct-03072-FL)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2014

    Decided:

    October 16, 2014

    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Albert Hood, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant


    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Raleigh,
    North
    Carolina;
    Michael
    Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner,
    North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George Albert Hood appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
    (1971).
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Hood v. Johns, No. 5:11-ct-03072-FL (E.D.N.C.

    Mar. 27, 2014).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like