Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rothwell v. Campbell, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    James Rothwell, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Rothwell appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Rothwell, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Rothwell appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Rothwell v. Campbell, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Rothwell, a prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina officials alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and accepted the magistrate's recommendation. Rothwell appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7691

    JAMES CALVIN ROTHWELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, Governor, State of South
    Carolina; PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, South
    Carolina Department of Corrections; GENE
    BAKER; TONY ELLIS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-93-2194-2-2AJ)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 25, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James Calvin Rothwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr.,
    TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rothwell v.
    Campbell, No. CA-93-2194-2-2AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like