Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, A/K/A Cletis, A/K/A Claytus, 91 F.3d 134, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an appeals court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion under Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the return of property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, therefore affirming the district court's ruling denying the motion for return of property.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 134 Docket: 96-6223

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an appeals court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion under Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the return of property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, therefore affirming the district court's ruling denying the motion for return of property.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, A/K/A Cletis, A/K/A Claytus, 91 F.3d 134, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an appeals court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of a defendant's motion under Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the return of property. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, therefore affirming the district court's ruling denying the motion for return of property.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    91 F.

    3d 134

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
    v.
    Emmanuel Ikechukwu ANUDU, a/k/a Cletis, a/k/a Claytus,
    Defendant--Appellant.
    No. 96-6223.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 23, 1996.
    Decided July 31, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-305-HAR)
    Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, Appellant Pro Se.
    Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P.
    41(e) motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anudu, No. CR-91-305-

    HAR (D.Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like