Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clark v. Nixon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views3 pages
    Michael Craig Clark filed a civil rights complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 against various defendants. The district court denied relief. Clark appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1802

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Craig Clark filed a civil rights complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 against various defendants. The district court denied relief. Clark appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views3 pages

    Clark v. Nixon, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Craig Clark filed a civil rights complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 against various defendants. The district court denied relief. Clark appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1802

    MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JONATHAN NIXON; JEFF PROCTOR; STATE OF NORTH
    CAROLINA; DONALD HOBBS; KENT CHAPPELL; CLIFF
    HOBBS; PAUL COPELAND; WALLY HOBBS; CHAD
    MATTHEWS; ALAN CORPREW; SCOTT WAFF,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    MARK DAVIS;
    COUNTY,

    JOHN

    V.

    MATTHEWS;

    PERQUIMANS
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-02-47-2-H-1)

    Submitted:

    October 22, 2004

    Decided:

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    December 9, 2004

    Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Carpenter Prentiss,


    HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Craig Clark appeals the district courts orders
    denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42
    U.S.C. 1983, 1985 (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1

    (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like