Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Edward Lee Bragg v. J.B. Metzger, III Virginia Parole Board, 99 F.3d 1129, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. It summarizes that the appellant, Edward Lee Bragg, was seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bragg's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Edward Lee Bragg v. J.B. Metzger, III Virginia Parole Board, 99 F.3d 1129, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. It summarizes that the appellant, Edward Lee Bragg, was seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bragg's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 99 F.3d 1129 Docket: 96-6728

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. It summarizes that the appellant, Edward Lee Bragg, was seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bragg's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Edward Lee Bragg v. J.B. Metzger, III Virginia Parole Board, 99 F.3d 1129, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1996. It summarizes that the appellant, Edward Lee Bragg, was seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bragg's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    99 F.

    3d 1129

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Edward Lee BRAGG, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    J.B. METZGER, III; Virginia Parole Board, RespondentsAppellees.
    No. 96-6728.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 17, 1996.
    Decided Oct. 24, 1996.

    Edward Lee Bragg, Appellant Pro Se.


    Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    W.D.Va.
    DISMISSED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition
    filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective
    Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Bragg v. Metzger, No. CA-95-74-R

    (W.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like