Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Allen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Kevin D. Allen's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, and affirmed the district court's ruling denying Allen's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Allen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Kevin D. Allen's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, and affirmed the district court's ruling denying Allen's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7124

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Kevin D. Allen's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, and affirmed the district court's ruling denying Allen's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Allen, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding defendant Kevin D. Allen's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, and affirmed the district court's ruling denying Allen's motion for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7124

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    KEVIN D. ALLEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
    Norman K. Moon,
    District Judge. (3:05-cr-00041-nkm-bwc-2)

    Submitted:

    December 11, 2008

    Decided:

    January 14, 2009

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin D. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin

    D.

    Allen

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    district

    court.

    3:05-cr-00041-nkm-bwc-2
    dispense

    with

    oral

    (W.D.

    argument

    United
    Va.

    June

    because

    States

    v.

    Allen,

    No.

    17

    18,

    2008).

    We

    facts

    and

    the

    &

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like