Tinsley v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1780

EDWARD G. TINSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-971333-AMD)
Submitted:

August 28, 1997

Decided:

September 12, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward G. Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
suit filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346
(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. United States, No. CA97-1333-AMD (D. Md. May 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like