Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of an interlocutory appeal from bankruptcy court orders. The bankruptcy court had previously authorized the employment of certain financial professionals in an underlying bankruptcy proceeding. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the interlocutory appeal for the reasons stated in the district court's orders. The Fourth Circuit also denied as moot a motion to intervene and denied a motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of an interlocutory appeal from bankruptcy court orders. The bankruptcy court had previously authorized the employment of certain financial professionals in an underlying bankruptcy proceeding. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the interlocutory appeal for the reasons stated in the district court's orders. The Fourth Circuit also denied as moot a motion to intervene and denied a motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1006

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of an interlocutory appeal from bankruptcy court orders. The bankruptcy court had previously authorized the employment of certain financial professionals in an underlying bankruptcy proceeding. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the interlocutory appeal for the reasons stated in the district court's orders. The Fourth Circuit also denied as moot a motion to intervene and denied a motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Minh Hoang v. Gary Rosen, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of an interlocutory appeal from bankruptcy court orders. The bankruptcy court had previously authorized the employment of certain financial professionals in an underlying bankruptcy proceeding. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's ruling dismissing the interlocutory appeal for the reasons stated in the district court's orders. The Fourth Circuit also denied as moot a motion to intervene and denied a motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1006

    In Re:

    MINH VU HOANG,
    Debtor.

    ---------------------MINH VU HOANG,
    Debtor Appellant,
    v.
    GARY A. ROSEN; ROGER SCHLOSSBERG,
    Trustees - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
    Judge. (8:11-cv-03431-DKC; 05-21078)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2012

    Decided:

    May 25, 2012

    Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se.


    Gary A. Rosen, Rockville,
    Maryland;
    Roger
    Schlossberg,
    SCHLOSSBERG
    &
    ASSOCIATES,
    Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Minh
    dismissing

    as

    Vu

    Hoang

    appeals

    interlocutory

    her

    the

    district

    appeal

    from

    courts
    the

    order

    bankruptcy

    courts orders authorizing the employment of certain financial


    professionals in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    Hoang v. Rosen (In Re:

    stated

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    Minh Vu Hoang), Nos. 8:11-cv-03431-DKC;

    05-21078 (D. Md. July 11, 2011; Dec. 1, 2011; Dec. 14, 2011).
    In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the motion to
    intervene.

    We deny Hoangs motion for appointment of counsel,

    and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like