Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Mario Rodriguez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mario Rodriguez's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Mario Rodriguez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mario Rodriguez's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6361

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mario Rodriguez's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Mario Rodriguez, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mario Rodriguez's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. Per curiam, the unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6361

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MARIO E. RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a O,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00031-FPS-1)

    Submitted:

    April 26, 2012

    Decided:

    May 1, 2012

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mario E. Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mario E. Rodriguez appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006)
    seeking

    reduction

    of

    his

    sentence.

    record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Rodriguez, No. 5:08-cr-00031-FPS-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Jan. 17,


    2012 & entered Jan. 18, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like