Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Moyler v. Warden Buckingham, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Derek Lionel Moyler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and Moyler appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Moyler was not entitled to relief under § 2254.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-10-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6989

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Derek Lionel Moyler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and Moyler appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Moyler was not entitled to relief under § 2254.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Moyler v. Warden Buckingham, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Derek Lionel Moyler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from his conviction. The district court denied relief and Moyler appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Moyler was not entitled to relief under § 2254.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6989

    DEREK LIONEL MOYLER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-99-409-AM)

    Submitted:

    October 7, 1999

    Decided:

    October 14, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Derek Lionel Moyler, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Derek Lionel Moyler seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Moyler v. Warden, Buckingham,

    No. CA-99-409-AM (E.D. Va. June 7, 1999).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like