Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Germain v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jean Bernard Germain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Germain relief and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7697

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jean Bernard Germain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Germain relief and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Germain v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Jean Bernard Germain under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials. The district court denied Germain relief and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7697

    JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden of M.C.A.C.; LENA
    KENT, Lieutenant; DANIEL STIELPER, Correctional Officer,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-00-195-JFM)

    Submitted:

    March 22, 2001

    Decided:

    March 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jean Bernard Germain, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jean Bernard Germain appeals the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
    We have reviewed the record and the districts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    Germain v. Corcoran, No. CA-00-195-JFM (D. Md.

    Nov. 16, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like