Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vernon L. Quinn v. J. Taylor, Officer Lynn C. Phillips Fred Speight, 30 F.3d 130, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Vernon L. Quinn in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against defendants J. Taylor, Lynn C. Phillips, and Fred Speight. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Quinn v. Taylor, No. CA-94-269-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1994).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 30 F.3d 130 Docket: 94-6597

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Vernon L. Quinn in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against defendants J. Taylor, Lynn C. Phillips, and Fred Speight. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Quinn v. Taylor, No. CA-94-269-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1994).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Vernon L. Quinn v. J. Taylor, Officer Lynn C. Phillips Fred Speight, 30 F.3d 130, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Vernon L. Quinn in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against defendants J. Taylor, Lynn C. Phillips, and Fred Speight. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Quinn v. Taylor, No. CA-94-269-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1994).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    30 F.

    3d 130

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Vernon L. QUINN, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    J. TAYLOR, Officer; Lynn C. Phillips; Fred Speight,
    Defendants Appellees.
    No. 94-6597.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 23, 1994.
    Decided: July 29, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94269-BO)
    Vernon L. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Quinn v. Taylor, No. CA-94-269-BO
    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like