Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Mitchell v. GMAC, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Willie H. Mitchell Jr. appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 29, 2004 order dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Mitchell v. GMAC, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Willie H. Mitchell Jr. appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 29, 2004 order dismissing the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-09-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1527

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Willie H. Mitchell Jr. appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 29, 2004 order dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Mitchell v. GMAC, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Willie H. Mitchell Jr. appealed a district court order that dismissed his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's March 29, 2004 order dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1527

    WILLIE H. MITCHELL, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GMAC; INTEGON INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (CA-03-56-2-FL)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2004

    Decided:

    September 21, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willie H. Mitchell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Donald Carpenter
    Prentiss, HORHNTAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Willie H. Mitchell, Jr. appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his complaint against GMAC and Integon Insurance
    Company for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Mitchell v. GMAC, No. CA-03-56-2-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2004).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like