Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Damron v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Wade Lee Damron, a Virginia inmate. The district court had denied relief on Damron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. As a result, the court denied Damron's motion to appoint counsel and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6076

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Wade Lee Damron, a Virginia inmate. The district court had denied relief on Damron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. As a result, the court denied Damron's motion to appoint counsel and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Damron v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Wade Lee Damron, a Virginia inmate. The district court had denied relief on Damron's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal frivolous. As a result, the court denied Damron's motion to appoint counsel and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6076

    WADE LEE DAMRON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBERT J. MCCABE, Sheriff; M. D. LATNEY,
    Director of Norfolk Community Hospital,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    NORFOLK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; GAVIN, Assistant
    Administrative Director for the Norfolk City
    Hospital/Norfolk City Jail; MEDIC TAYLOR,
    Medic for Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY BATES,
    Deputy of Norfolk City Jail,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-96-228-3)
    Submitted:

    July 24, 1997

    Decided:

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    August 6, 1997

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Wade Lee Damron, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Robert Dion, HUDGINS,
    CARTER & COLEMAN, Alexandria, Virginia; Carolyn Porter Oast,
    Deborah Sue Hudler, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under
    28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel
    and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    Damron v. McCabe, No. CA-96-228-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like