Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Robert Berry Parker v. Governor Harry Hughes Secret Service Agency of Maryland, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. It summarizes that the appellant, Robert Berry Parker, filed the appeal outside of the 30-day period required by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and did not request an extension. As such, the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider the case and dismissed the appeal. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the issues had been decisively ruled on previously.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Robert Berry Parker v. Governor Harry Hughes Secret Service Agency of Maryland, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. It summarizes that the appellant, Robert Berry Parker, filed the appeal outside of the 30-day period required by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and did not request an extension. As such, the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider the case and dismissed the appeal. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the issues had been decisively ruled on previously.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-04-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 843 F.2d 1388 Docket: 86-2162

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. It summarizes that the appellant, Robert Berry Parker, filed the appeal outside of the 30-day period required by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and did not request an extension. As such, the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider the case and dismissed the appeal. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the issues had been decisively ruled on previously.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Robert Berry Parker v. Governor Harry Hughes Secret Service Agency of Maryland, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. It summarizes that the appellant, Robert Berry Parker, filed the appeal outside of the 30-day period required by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and did not request an extension. As such, the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to consider the case and dismissed the appeal. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the issues had been decisively ruled on previously.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    843 F.

    2d 1388
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert Berry PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Governor Harry HUGHES; Secret Service Agency of
    Maryland,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 86-2162.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Feb. 29, 1988.
    Decided: April 5, 1988.

    Robert Berry Parker, appellant pro se.


    Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit
    Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Robert Berry Parker noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period
    established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the
    appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P.
    4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and
    jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264
    (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).
    Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal
    period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. See Shah v.
    Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975
    (1984). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

    We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have
    been decided authoritatively.

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like