Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carrillo v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Lorenzo Carrillo filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Carrillo's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-12-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7224

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lorenzo Carrillo filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Carrillo's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Carrillo v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lorenzo Carrillo filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Carrillo's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7224

    LORENZO V. CARRILLO,
    Petitioner

    - Appellant,

    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-37-2)
    Submitted:

    November 18, 1997

    Decided:

    December 2, 1997

    Before ERVIN, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lorenzo V. Carrillo, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr.,


    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Carrillo v. Angelone, No. CA-97-37-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like