Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Carr v. Holt, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Carr filed a Bivens complaint against various officials at FCI Edgefield alleging constitutional violations. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation and denied Carr relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Carr's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Carr v. Holt, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Steven Carr filed a Bivens complaint against various officials at FCI Edgefield alleging constitutional violations. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation and denied Carr relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Carr's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7508

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Carr filed a Bivens complaint against various officials at FCI Edgefield alleging constitutional violations. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation and denied Carr relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Carr's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Carr v. Holt, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Carr filed a Bivens complaint against various officials at FCI Edgefield alleging constitutional violations. The district court accepted the magistrate's recommendation and denied Carr relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to deny Carr's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7508

    STEVEN D. CARR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    RAY HOLT, Regional Director of Bureau of Prisons; HARRELL WATTS,
    Administrator; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield; L.
    FUERTES ROSARIO, Health Services Administrator at FCI Edgefield;
    E. FAYTONG, Physicians Assistant; L. GUEVARH, Assistant Medical
    Services Administrator; A. SAHA, Physicians Assistant; J. LOPEZ,
    MLP at FCI Edgefield; R. BLOCKER, MLP at FCI Edgefield; J.
    SERRANE; A. WILLIAMS, X-Ray Technician; NFN TURNER, Food Service
    Administrator; A. STACKS, Assistant Food Service Administrator;
    NFN MAHONES, Unit Manager; NFN BOLTIN, Counselor; NFN VINNING,
    Lieutenant; NFN LOVEGROVE, Food Service Forman; THOMAS C. DAVIS,
    Food Service Supervisor at FCI Edgefield,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (6:06-cv-02333-TLW)

    Submitted:

    February 28, 2008

    Decided: March 6, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven D. Carr, Appellant Pro Se.


    Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven

    D.

    Carr

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
    Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Carr v. Holt, No. 6:06-cv-02333-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 25,

    2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like