Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Harrison v. CIA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Judy Harrison against several government agencies. The district court had dismissed Harrison's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harrison's request for oral arguments, determining the case was adequately addressed by the existing court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1510

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Judy Harrison against several government agencies. The district court had dismissed Harrison's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harrison's request for oral arguments, determining the case was adequately addressed by the existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Harrison v. CIA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Judy Harrison against several government agencies. The district court had dismissed Harrison's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harrison's request for oral arguments, determining the case was adequately addressed by the existing court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1510

    JUDY HARRISON,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; FBI; CHICAGO FBI-DIVISIONS;
    WASHINGTON FBI-DIVISIONS; VIRGINIA FBI-DIVISIONS,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00163-JRS)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2010

    Decided:

    August 4, 2010

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Judy Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Judy

    Harrison

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency,

    No.

    (E.D.

    3:10-cv-00163-JRS

    Va.

    Apr.

    2,

    2010).

    We

    deny

    Harrisons motion for oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like