Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 37 views

    United States v. Matthew J. Dury, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Matthew James Dury appealed the district court's denial of his motion to challenge jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Matthew J. Dury, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    37 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Matthew James Dury appealed the district court's denial of his motion to challenge jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6203

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Matthew James Dury appealed the district court's denial of his motion to challenge jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    37 views2 pages

    United States v. Matthew J. Dury, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Matthew James Dury appealed the district court's denial of his motion to challenge jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6203

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MATTHEW JAMES DURY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)

    Submitted:

    July 16, 2013

    Decided:

    July 23, 2013

    Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se.


    Donald David Gast,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Matthew James Dury appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to challenge jurisdiction.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Dury,

    25,

    2013).

    facts

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    No.

    dispense

    1:08-cr-00016-MR-1
    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    (W.D.N.C.
    because

    presented

    in

    Jan.
    the
    the

    We

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like