Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    United States v. Stewart, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Timothy Stewart's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as Stewart's claims challenging his sentence were without merit. The court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Stewart, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Timothy Stewart's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as Stewart's claims challenging his sentence were without merit. The court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6051

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Timothy Stewart's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as Stewart's claims challenging his sentence were without merit. The court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Stewart, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Ronald Timothy Stewart's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, as Stewart's claims challenging his sentence were without merit. The court therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6051

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONALD TIMOTHY STEWART,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-41-F)
    Submitted:

    February 27, 1997

    Decided:

    March 13, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronald Timothy Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders (1) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by
    Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
    104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error
    because Appellant's claims challenging his sentence are without
    merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like