Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Wilson v. Curry, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Wilson filed a § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Wilson appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wilson v. Curry, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Steven Wilson filed a § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Wilson appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6092

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Wilson filed a § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Wilson appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Curry, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Wilson filed a § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Wilson appealed the denial. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, dispensing with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6092

    STEVEN C. WILSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE CURRY; ROBERT C. LEWIS; WILEY T. SULLIVAN; CARLTON JONES; BONNIE BOYETTE; JOSEPH L.
    HAMILTON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-97-608-5-F-(2))
    Submitted:

    April 16, 1998

    Decided:

    May 1, 1998

    Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Steven C. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Wilson v. Curry, No. CA-97-608-5-F-(2) (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1997). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like