Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bellamy v. Clatterbuck, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Engram Bellamy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Michael Clatterbuck. The district court denied Bellamy relief and Bellamy appealed. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bellamy's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6221

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Engram Bellamy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Michael Clatterbuck. The district court denied Bellamy relief and Bellamy appealed. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bellamy's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    0 views2 pages

    Bellamy v. Clatterbuck, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Engram Bellamy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Michael Clatterbuck. The district court denied Bellamy relief and Bellamy appealed. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Bellamy's motion for appointment of counsel and affirming the district court's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6221

    ENGRAM M. BELLAMY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL M. CLATTERBUCK, Magistrate,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-02-1133)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2003

    Decided:

    May 26, 2004

    Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Engram M. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Engram M. Bellamy appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we deny Bellamys motion for

    appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See Bellamy v. Clatterbuck, No. CA-02-1133 (W.D. Va. Nov.

    12, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like