Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    McGill v. Snyder, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James McGill appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny McGill's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McGill v. Snyder, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    James McGill appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny McGill's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7457

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James McGill appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny McGill's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    McGill v. Snyder, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James McGill appealed the district court's denial of relief on his Bivens complaint against prison officials. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's decision to deny McGill's complaint for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7457

    JAMES MICHAEL MCGILL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE E. SNYDER; DAVID FARMER; W. BRANCH; R.
    CHERRY; B. HEDSPETH; T. HOWELL; K. DUBOSE; S.
    DORSEY; G. SEXTON; J. AGUILAR; D. GOODMAN;
    D.D. DOUGLAS; M. YOUNG; S.D. STEVENSON; C.
    WARD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00249-FL)

    Submitted: January 18, 2007

    Decided:

    January 23, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Michael McGill, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James Michael McGill appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
    (1971).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    McGill v. Snyder, No. 5:05-ct-00249-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8,

    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like