Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sampson v. Glover, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Dannelle Sampson Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6124

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Dannelle Sampson Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Sampson v. Glover, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Larry Dannelle Sampson Jr.'s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6124

    LARRY DANNELLE SAMPSON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SAMUEL B. GLOVER, Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
    Services,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (0:08-cv-03623-DCN)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 2009

    Decided:

    June 23, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Dannelle Sampson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry
    courts

    order

    Dannelle
    accepting

    Sampson,
    the

    Jr.,

    appeals

    recommendation

    of

    the
    the

    district
    magistrate

    judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under


    28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.


    0:08-cv-03623-DCN (D.S.C. Dec. 30, 2008).

    Sampson v. Glover, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like