Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Wynn v. Badgett, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Lee Wynn Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its June 7, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wynn v. Badgett, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Ernest Lee Wynn Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its June 7, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6857

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ernest Lee Wynn Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its June 7, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Wynn v. Badgett, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Lee Wynn Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its June 7, 2010 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6857

    ERNEST LEE WYNN, JR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MS. BADGETT, Medical Administrator; O. AJUMOBI, Dr.,
    Institutional
    Physician;
    MS.
    BURNETTE,
    Grievance
    Coordinator; KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden; DR. OHI, Institutional
    Physician; D. HODGES, Superintendent; GOHAR ABBASI, Dr.,
    Institutional Physician,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:10-cv-00490-LO-TCB)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2010

    Decided:

    October 22, 2010

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ernest Lee Wynn, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ernest

    Lee

    Wynn,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Wynn

    June 7, 2010).

    v.

    Badgett,

    No.

    1:10-cv-00490-LO-TCB

    (E.D.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like