Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Williams v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Floyd Glenn Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against Gertrude Hawkins, the Clerk of the Court for Prince George's County, which the district court denied. 2) Williams appealed the denial and filed a motion to vacate the district court's order, which the district court also denied. 3) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no abuse of discretion, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Williams v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Floyd Glenn Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against Gertrude Hawkins, the Clerk of the Court for Prince George's County, which the district court denied. 2) Williams appealed the denial and filed a motion to vacate the district court's order, which the district court also denied. 3) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no abuse of discretion, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7558

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Floyd Glenn Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against Gertrude Hawkins, the Clerk of the Court for Prince George's County, which the district court denied. 2) Williams appealed the denial and filed a motion to vacate the district court's order, which the district court also denied. 3) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no abuse of discretion, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Williams v. Hawkins, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Floyd Glenn Williams filed a § 1983 complaint against Gertrude Hawkins, the Clerk of the Court for Prince George's County, which the district court denied. 2) Williams appealed the denial and filed a motion to vacate the district court's order, which the district court also denied. 3) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial, finding no abuse of discretion, and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7558

    FLOYD GLENN WILLIAMS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GERTRUDE HAWKINS, Clerk of the Court, Prince
    George's County,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-951207-L)
    Submitted:

    December 14, 1995

    Decided:

    January 18, 1996

    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Floyd Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    motion to vacate the court's earlier order denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams
    v. Hawkins, No. CA-95-1207-L (D. Md. Aug. 28, 1995). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like